The UN and Somalia:Outstanding Issues
* The debate over Somalia reinforces the argument that the UN might have played a useful role in Africa, but always slows, always late. In the case of Somalia, however, it is a kind of never late after it is too late
* Although not an exception, the Somali case blurs peacekeeping with peace reinforcement; hence it presents a monumental challenge to the UN.
* While there is some degree of consensus to support Somalia and a recognition that the need exists, one finds different views and efforts by Security Council member states, the UN and other international bodies to respond to the need. Different organs of the UN have differing degree of perceptions. The Secretariat is struggling to keep on track in the face of these differences.
* To the extent that the DPKO is unconvinced to send troops to Somalia its position on the matter is largely the product of historical inconvenience than current realities on the ground.
* Stepping in to Somalia was a bold step reflecting the AUs resolve to intervene in extremely adverse situations, while on the other hand it demonstrates the UN’s unwillingness to get involved in missions where it assumes it could not guarantee success.
* Although there are no strong arguments against serious engagement, and despite the lofty rhetoric, periodic debates and promises, a progress on UN peacekeeping operations remains stilted with a considerable risk of obstruction and relapse in peace and state building in Somalia.
* Although the UN is providing some assistance and is willing to support the AU, serious engagement and extensive assistance for operational support to AMISOM cannot be taken for granted.
* Besides, whatever new troops and support AMISOM may acquire its weaknesses couldn’t be overcome unless the UN comes to its rescue. Reactivating the decomposed Somali state requires capable and experienced leadership, extensive resources and expertise.
More to come
| < Prev |
|---|



